Logo image
Frozen Fruit and Vegetable Perceptions and Usage among a Multistate Sample of SNAP-Ed and EFNEP Participants
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Frozen Fruit and Vegetable Perceptions and Usage among a Multistate Sample of SNAP-Ed and EFNEP Participants

Annie J. Roe, Gemma E. Bastian, Raveen Rani and Joslyn K. Russell
Current developments in nutrition, Vol.10(2), pp.1-9
02/2026

Abstract

Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program food preferences frozen fruits and vegetables low socioeconomic status Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education Frozen Foods
Background Despite the health benefits of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables (FV), most Americans do not consume the recommended amounts. Federal nutrition education programs for adults with low income promote frozen fruits and vegetables (FFV) to improve dietary intake, save money, and prevent food waste. However, FFV purchasing, use, and attitudes among this consumer base are not well understood. Objectives The aim of this study is to determine the perceptions and use of FFV among adults who have participated in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program—Education (SNAP-Ed) or Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) classes. Methods An electronic survey was developed to assess frozen food purchases, FFV perceptions and preparation, and nutrition education and outreach. Subjects were recruited via SNAP-Ed/EFNEP programs. Descriptive analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results Subjects (n = 421) were mostly female (84%), without a college degree (72%), and with annual incomes <$25,000 (63%). Roughly one-third of respondents reported eating frozen foods every few days or almost every day, one-third ate them weekly, and one-third ate frozen foods a few times per month or year. Most (59%) considered using SNAP benefits to buy frozen foods very or extremely important. The top reasons for purchasing FFV were long shelf life (38%), ease of preparation (36%), and convenience (34%). When comparing FFV to fresh FV, participants considered FFV to result in less food waste but considered fresh FV to have fewer preservatives, better appearance, texture, nutrition, and flavor. Conclusions SNAP-Ed/EFNEP-participating adults are a key consumer demographic for frozen foods, using them to save money and limit food waste. However, misconceptions persist, such as that fresh FV are more nutritious than frozen. Nutrition education programs for adults with low income could incorporate additional content on adding FFV into a healthy diet to help participants use these cost-effective foods to meet their nutrition and health goals.
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2026.107640View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image