- Title
- Epistemic normativity as autotelic: why suspension and judgment aren’t like archery
- Creators
- Matthew Chrisman - University of EdinburghGraham Hubbs - University of Idaho, Politics and Philosophy
- Publication Details
- Philosophical studies, pp.1-19
- Publisher
- Springer Nature
- Number of pages
- 19
- Identifiers
- 996844123401851
- Copyright
- This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
- Academic Unit
- Institute for Modeling Collaboration and Innovation; Politics and Philosophy
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
Journal article
Epistemic normativity as autotelic: why suspension and judgment aren’t like archery
Philosophical studies, pp.1-19
10/11/2025
Metrics
1 Record Views