Abstract
Staining quality and reproducibility are essential factors to monitor laboratory quality assurance. In the last decade, there has been an increase in the use of digital pathology and image analysis. While the adoption of these tools provides a potential means to track staining precision by optical density (OD), it also presents challenges. Results from image analysis are more sensitive to variations in staining than microscopic evaluation by a pathologist. There are two goals with this study. The first was to track the precision of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, in both nuclear and cytoplasmic components by OD. The second was to determine the impact of different pre-analytical and analytical variables on the OD results. Specifically, the endpoints investigated were quality parameters including impacts of section thickness, protocol manipulation, expired hematoxylin on staining precision and reproducibility of staining over time. Our results show that image analysis of H&E-stained tissue sections is a viable tool for assessing and verifying staining quality. We also show that OD analysis results for H&E-stained sections are affected by changing pre-analytical and/or reagent variables. These authors chose a graphical rather than fully statistical analysis of the results to highlight the utility of visual aids in demonstrating H&E staining reproducibility.